Reptiles · Sea turtles

Green Sea Turtle

Chelonia mydas (Linnaeus, 1758)
syn. Chelonia agassizii, Chelonia japonica, Chelonia mydas agassizii, Chelonia mydas mydas, Chelonia viridis, Testudo mydas
up to 1.5 m68 - 190 Kg1-40 mCITES ILeast Concern
1402

A hard-shelled reptile with a shell to 1.5 m (5 ft) and a weight up to 190 kg (420 lb), olive to dark brown, with a blunt serrated beak. The name is not about the shell: the fat under it is green, colored by the seagrass the animal spends its life eating.

Adults are vegetarians, and almost uniquely so among sea turtles. They crop seagrass blades rather than pulling them up, returning to the same patches so the regrowth stays young and digestible - grazing that maintains the meadow rather than mining it. Hatchlings and juveniles eat animals and switch diet as they grow.

The sex of a clutch is set by the temperature of the sand, not by chromosomes. Below about 29 C a nest produces males, above it females, and the transition spans barely two degrees. On beaches that have warmed, clutches now run over 90 percent female, which is one of the more direct ways a changing climate reaches an animal.

A female returns to nest on the beach where she hatched, after decades at sea and often thousands of kilometers away, navigating in part by reading the local slant of the Earth's magnetic field. She lays several clutches in a season and then may not breed again for years.

How to recognise it
  • smooth oval shell with four pairs of side plates, olive to dark brown
  • single pair of scales between the eyes, which distinguishes it from the hawksbill
  • blunt rounded beak with a serrated edge, not the hooked beak of a hawksbill
  • shell up to 1.5 m

Why it's threatened

Residential & commercial development
Housing & urban areas · Commercial & industrial areas · Tourism & recreation areas
Transportation & service corridors
Shipping lanes
Biological resource use
Intentional use (species is the target) · Intentional use: (subsistence/small scale) [harvest] · Intentional use: (large scale) [harvest] · Unintentional effects: (subsistence/small scale) [harvest] · Unintentional effects: (large scale) [harvest]
Invasive species, genes & disease
Named species
Pollution
Garbage & solid waste
Climate change & severe weather
Habitat shifting & alteration · Temperature extremes · Storms & flooding

Green Turtles are highly susceptible to anthropogenic threats including bycatch, direct take and trade (legal and illegal), collision with marine vessels, habitat loss and degradation, pollution, disease and climate change.

Direct take of turtle meat, eggs, and parts has been the most important source of mortality for Green Turtles for centuries. Although this has declined in recent years, it remains a common practice in certain cultures in many parts of the world (Bräutigam and Eckert 2006, Humber et al. 2014, Senko and Burgher et al. 2022). A recent global analysis of all reported 'illegal exploitation'—i.e., the take or trade of turtles against established law in the locality where the take occurred— produced estimates of approximately 44,000 turtles/year over the past decade, most of which were Green Turtles (Senko and Burgher et al. 2022). This analysis also suggested a decline over time in the illegal take of turtles, although a review of legal turtle harvests (Humber et al. 2014) found that at that time at least 42 countries and territories permitted direct take of turtles, and the primary species used was Green Turtles (>80%).

Industrial and small-scale artisanal fisheries inflict severe impacts on sea turtles (Wallace et al. 2013a). In particular, small-scale fisheries occur primarily in developing nations with limited capacity and resources to obtain data, and where fisheries management is limited or non-existent, thus hindering comprehensive evaluations of the impacts of incidental capture of marine wildlife. Weak governance, poverty, and a lack of resources for local fisheries managers means that scant attention is devoted to assessing impacts of bycatch on sea turtles. Sea turtles get captured in coastal fishing gear most commonly in gillnets, longlines and trawl nets (Wallace et al. 2013a). Industrial-scale fisheries also incidentally capture Green Turtles and other sea turtle species; conservation resolutions approved by inter-governmental regional fisheries management organizations need to be adequately observed, enforced, and monitored over time to implement intended conservation benefits.

Climate change is known to influence migratory patterns and breeding success of sea turtles (Patricio et al. 2021), and a recent study in the Great Barrier Reef, Australia—home to the world's most abundant Green Turtle subpopulation—revealed feminization and highly skewed sex ratios attributed to impacts of climate change (Jensen et al. 2018). As long-lived reptiles with temperature-dependent sex determination, all marine turtles are vulnerable to change in climate, in particular the effect of rising temperatures on offspring sex ratios and lowered hatching or reduced hatchling fitness (Patricio et al. 2021). The increased incidence of hypothermic stunning, which killed thousands of Green Turtles in Texas during the winter of 2020–2021, is suggested to be linked to range shifts of foraging Green Turtles increasing their abundance in Texas inshore waters.

Habitat loss and degradation is a continuing threat for marine turtle populations both at sea from anthropogenic activities such as fisheries and through coastal development (Biddiscombe et al. 2020). The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) predicts that as sea levels rise in the next 100 years, coastlines will migrate landwards, and increased development of anthropogenic structures will further reduce beach availability for marine turtles (Biddiscombe et al. 2020). With coastal development comes light pollution and the impacts of artificial light at night include significantly decreased survival of hatchlings and disruption of nesting females (Biddiscombe et al. 2020). Plastic pollution degrades marine turtle habitat both at sea and on land and we have yet to understand the implications of ingestion of plastics on reproduction and longevity of marine turtles (Duncan et al. 2015).

Green Turtle Fibropapilloma (GTFP) disease is prevalent in many populations worldwide, and has been shown to be more prevalent in areas with lower water quality (Van Houtan et al. 2014), typically associated with coastal development. Although GTFP does not seem to be a current major threat, disease virulence may be enhanced with predicted climate change (Patricio et al. 2021).

Threats across the different regions are varied and more detail can be found in the regional subpopulation assessments. For more details about threats to Green Turtles globally, see Seminoff et al. 2015.

Threat classification from the IUCN Red List.

Comments

Please, sign in to leave a comment

Continue with a social account — yours will be created automatically.

No comments yet — be the first.

Last Update: August 14, 2026