Humpback Whale
Humpback Whale
Humpback Whale
© Etienne
Mammals · Whales

Humpback Whale

Megaptera novaeangliae (Borowski, 1781)
syn. Balaena allamack, Balaena atlanticus, Balaena boops, Balaena gibbosa, Balaena lalandii, Balaena longimana +19 more
up to 17 m35 T0-200 mCITES ILeast Concern
953

Up to 17 m (56 ft) and 30 tonnes, with flippers a third as long as the body - proportionally the longest limbs of any animal - and a head studded with knobs, each growing a single hair. Diving, it lifts the tail clear of the water, and the black and white pattern underneath identifies the individual for life.

The males sing. A song is a structured sequence of phrases repeated for hours, all the males in a population sing the same one, and it changes through the season while they change with it. Occasionally a song from a neighboring population arrives and replaces the local one entirely within a season - a cultural wave, moving across an ocean, in a species where nobody is teaching anybody deliberately.

Feeding is engineering. Groups blow curtains of bubbles around a school of fish, driving it into a tight column, and then rise through it with mouths open. Which animal blows and which herds is consistent within a group, and the technique differs between regions.

In this sea a humpback is an exceptional record rather than a species you go to see. The nearest regular population is in the northern 🌊 Indian Ocean, and the handful of reports from here are animals that took a wrong turn through the strait.

How to recognise it
  • enormous white flippers, up to a third of the body length, longer than any other whale's
  • knobbly bumps on the head and jaw, each with a single hair
  • raises the tail fluke clear of the water when diving, pattern unique to each animal
  • length up to 17 m

Why it's threatened

Energy production & mining
Oil & gas drilling
Transportation & service corridors
Shipping lanes
Biological resource use
Intentional use: (subsistence/small scale) [harvest] · Intentional use: (large scale) [harvest] · Unintentional effects: (subsistence/small scale) [harvest]
Pollution
Noise pollution

Although modern commercial whaling seriously depleted all Humpback populations, some of which had already been reduced by pre-modern whaling, the species has demonstrated remarkable resilience, and there have been substantial increases in the North Atlantic, North Pacific, and Southern Hemisphere. Humpback whales have been legally protected from commercial whaling worldwide since 1966, and there have been few catches since 1968. It is unclear whether there has been any recovery in the small, isolated population in the Arabian Sea.

Today, small numbers only are taken for local consumption in Greenland (up to 10 annually) and the island of Bequia (St. Vincent and the Grenadines) (up to four annually), with occasional takes elsewhere (IWC 2018b).

Humpback Whales, along with North Atlanatic Right Whales (Eubalaena glacialis), seem to be the most vulnerable of the large whales to becoming accidentally entangled, often fatally, in fishing gear and sometimes other debris. They are also vulnerable to injury by ship strikes, which can also be fatal. In most areas, the majority of entanglements (Robbins et al. 2009), and also the majority of ship strikes, are likely to go undetected, but there is no generally accepted method for extrapolating from the observed events to estimate totals.

State members of the IWC are encouraged to report bycatches and ship strikes annually to the IWC, but few do so. The figures submitted in 2018 for entanglements include: USA 78 (26 in the Atlantic in 2015, 52 in the Pacific in 2016); Australia 46; Greenland 5, Japan 3, and New Zealand, Argentina, Norway, and Spain (1 each) (Hughes 2019). The reported ship strike numbers were: USA 13, Australia 5, and Brazil 1. The figures include some potentially non-fatal incidents (such as whales entangled and released).

Minimum estimates of average annual deaths in US waters are: west coast (2012-16) - 16.7 from entanglement and 2.1 from ship strikes (Carretta et al. 2018); east coast (2010-14) ­– 7.2 from entanglements and 1.8 from ship strikes (Hayes et al. 2017); Alaska and Hawaii (2011-15) − 18 from entanglements in fishing gear, 2.8 from unspecified marine debris, and 4.4 from ship strikes (Muto et al. 2018). Urbán et al. (2017) reported 95 cases of entanglement of Humpback Whales on the Mexican Pacific coast during 2004-2017 of which 42 were released, 6 died and the fate of the others was either unknown or considered not to be severely injured.

In a study of Humpback entanglements in Scottish fishing gear during 1992-2016, Ryan et al. (2016) found that most Humpback Whales spent only brief periods in Scottish waters, but that the entanglement rate per day of whale presence was such that it would be unsustainable for a population that fed regularly in Scottish waters.

The distribution of Humpbacks in the Arabian Sea overlaps that of fisheries known to be dangerous to Humpbacks, and 30-40% of the photographed whales showed entanglement-related scars (Minton et al. 2011).

Threat classification from the IUCN Red List.

Comments

Please, sign in to leave a comment

Continue with a social account - yours will be created automatically.

No comments yet — be the first.

Last Update: August 14, 2026